North Coast Current > Dialogue > Commentary > Commentary: Vote no on Prop. K

Commentary: Vote no on Prop. K

Teresa Arballo Barth
October 31, 2012 •
Filed under Commentary, Dialogue

Proposition K – Shall the voters of the city of Encinitas directly elect a mayor and four City Council members? Sounds like a great idea. But is it?

Most cities have a directly elected mayor. I would argue that Encinitas is not like most cities.

Twenty-five years ago, residents of five very different communities came together to protect the unique character of each area from the over-development zeal of the then county Board of Supervisors. They came together not to be the same but to maintain their differences.

Just as they saw Encinitas as a coalition of communities, they wanted the council to be a collaboration of diverse opinions and perspectives.

Unfortunately, over the years partisan politics slipped into the process of the annual selection of mayor and deputy mayor. Individual council members have seen their role as one of power assuming greater authority for themselves and those who support them.

The impartial analysis included in the ballot statement describes the duties as established by “custom and practice” and performance of certain ceremonial functions. It makes the position of mayor sound as though it’s really not very important.

Currently, the “custom and practice” actually includes some very important duties. The mayor and city manager determine the council agenda, providing the mayor an opportunity to prevent some issues from coming to the council and to promote his/her pet projects. The mayor makes appointments to regional and state boards, chairs the city’s Housing Authority, the Encinitas Financing Authority and is the city’s representative to the League of California Cities. The mayor is the spokesperson for the city to the media.

The solution is not to create a new, more powerful and potentially expensive position that will open the door even wider for special interest money to influence local politics. The answer is simple. Codify a rotation system to take the petty politics out of the process. This will create certainty not only for the council members but for the public and the city staff as well.

I believe this will set a positive tone sending a clear message that the council is working together in the best interest of the city, not their own personal agendas.

Join me in voting no on Prop. K.

Teresa Arballo Barth is an Encinitas city councilwoman

Community commentaries are the opinions of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the North Coast Current

Print Friendly

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

The North Coast Current provides this Comments feature as a way for readers to share viewpoints on stories and issues. The North Coast Current moderates comments. Editors reserve the right to accept or reject comments as they see fit. Comments must be civil and constructive regardless of political or religious leanings, and must be specific to the story being commented about. Comments deemed to contain threats will be rejected without exception. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. The North Coast Current is not responsible for unverified facts or allegations stated by posters. As published material accessible to the public, the North Coast Current will occasionally republish posted comments in the Dialogue section of its printed editions. By commenting here, as with submitting letters to the editor, readers grant the right to publish comments in the North Coast Current print edition.

One Response to “Commentary: Vote no on Prop. K”

  1. Olivier Canler on October 31st, 2012 5:36 pm

    I agree. No on Prop K
    It makes no sense.
    What we need is civility and courtesy on council and a coded mayor rotation and we will do just fine.